The trade union movement has done wonders for Barbados since it began here in 1942, becoming one of the society’s pillars through its contribution to our social and economic development. So the success and continued existence of the leading labour organization, Barbados Workers’ Union (BWU), must be of interest to us all. It must remain relevant and responsive to the times.
There is some anti-trade union sentiment that shows no understanding of the context in which unions were formed and the value they have added. The unions have not only defended the rights of workers but have successfully lobbied for legislation, such as social security law to the benefit to all. The BWU’s footprints are clear.
Last week marked the end of an era at the BWU when two of its leading officers, Clifford Mayers and LeVere Richards, retired. With 100 years’ service between them, they had become legends. Their long tenure followed an established pattern at the union which had been set by its late general secretary Sir Frank Walcott and others who worked with the institution, and continued by incumbent leader Sir Roy Trotman.
The BWU has been strong on industrial relations and has established an enviable track record under Sir Frank and Sir Roy. In its early days the union needed strong leaders, who also wielded a lot of power and often appeared bigger than the organization. In Sir Frank and Sir Roy the union found such figures. This worked for the labour movement in many ways; in other respects, it hampered the union.
While the BWU is bigger than any individual and will survive their departure, as evident when Sir Frank stepped down, so will be the case when Sir Roy moves on, as he must.
But herein lies a fundamental weakness with the BWU. It should not be left to guessing as to retirement or for that matter the succession process of its executive leadership. These processes should have long formed part of the organization’s governance systems and be known by its membership and the public. Such requirements form modern business practices and requirements.
This issue of governance within the union raises a number of questions. Has its executive council failed to set clear rules and guidelines for its chief executive officer? Has this council become a rubber stamp? Does the union adhere to the same systems and procedures expected of other corporate entities?
Throughout the history of this island’s labour movement, the BWU has enjoyed staunch support of the workers. Today there is a feeling that this support is on the wane and various reasons are suggested.
The union must adapt to the modern business climate. It must be more transparent and accept new governance requirements to not only survive but, more importantly, grow.
