Barbados can be proud of its democratic traditions and institutions which have made a smooth transition from the colonial era to this post-Independence period. Our Parliament is testimony to this continuum which makes today’s joint sitting of both chambers to mark its 375th anniversary so very special.
The observance of this event is bigger than any political party or individual and is an occasion when those elected to represent the people in Parliament must rise above narrow party lines. Our standards and decorum must be always high and exemplary.
Parliamentarians themselves must ensure they do not unwittingly undermine either their contribution or esteem by their own politically expedient actions. A sensible approach, often described as the Barbadian conservative nature, is necessary. The classic example is the way we treat our former prime ministers. We have reached the maturity where we can and must do better as a nation. Former holders of this office having demitted Parliament should be accorded greater respect and certain privileges
Yet, while we acknowledge this milestone, we recognise that there is a need for major improvements in the legislature. As this country approaches its 50th anniversary of Independence, the issue of parliamentary reform ought to be addressed, if the primary objective must be on ensuring it touches the lives of not only its members, but all the people of this land in a more meaningful way.
The version of the Westminster tradition which we have long followed is clearly in need of a revamp to ensure better governance, accountability and transparency. What Barbados has adopted from Westminster is vastly different to what is practised in Britain. We simply cannot implant those mores and ways of doing things; not even the changes adopted in London.
However, we clearly need to make the committee system much more meaningful, especially as the legislature keeps a constant check on the executive. This already happens with other Commonwealth nations. Â
Our parliamentarians need to ask themselves why they should not all be full-time legislators. The period of part-time representation when the planter and mercantile class controlled the legislature and the limited representation offered to a very restricted electorate is long gone. Like any modern corporation, our Parliament must adapt to change. There are many questions to be answered.
• Why can’t the House have an annual calendar indicating its sittings and recesses?
• Why isn’t there a vibrant weekly question time?
• Why isn’t there greater emphasis on private members’ business?
The people must share the same vision with the Government to whom they have granted responsibility for their development and protection. This must be a reality beyond election time.
Much more is expected and required of all elected politicians who are supposedly answerable to the people, but in reality answer to no one. Today’s celebration should not be lost on the majority of this island’s people.
