Sunday, May 24, 2026

Court rules against fingerprinting

Date:

Share post:

PLANS TO MAKE it mandatory for Barbadians to be fingerprinted when leaving or entering the island’s air and sea ports have been deemed unconstitutional.

Yesterday, High Court judge Justice Pamela Beckles also ruled that the Immigration (Biometrics) Regulations 2015 “were not properly and lawfully enacted in accordance with the provisions contained in Section 41 of the Interpretation Act, Chapter 1 of the Laws of Barbados for the enacting of regulations that are subject to negative resolution and as a result are null and void and of no legal effect”.

Attorney at law and Member of Parliament Edmund Hinkson, who headed a team of lawyers representing fellow attorney and political activist David Comissiong, described the decision as sending a clear message that “no Government is above the law”.

Comissiong had brought a constitutional case against Prime Minister Freundel Stuart, whose office is responsible for immigration, Attorney General Adriel Brathwaite and Chief Immigration Officer Wayne Marshall. (TKS)

Please read the full story in today’s Weekend Nation, or in the eNATION edition. 

Related articles

Roll, rain and high drama as King of the Hill roars into action

The 2026 edition of the First Citizens King of the Hill event got underway this morning as drivers...

Police warn public over fake traffic penalty scam notice

The Barbados Police Service is warning the public about a fraudulent notice currently circulating online, which falsely claims...

Suspect killed after opening fire on Secret Service near White House

A gunman who shot at a White House security checkpoint was killed in an exchange of fire with...

Work on cultural facility at standstill

Questions are mounting over the Barbados National Performing Arts Centre in Newton, Christ Church, (at right) as work at the...